Begin by journaling three decisions you made on autopilot this week, including who influenced them and which constraints you assumed were fixed. Circle recurring triggers, then ask how those triggers might be redesigned, delayed, exaggerated, or removed. Patterns are invitations; interrogate them gently but persistently.
Rewrite the problem five ways using formats like “How might we…,” “What would make the opposite true…,” and “What would break if we achieved the goal tomorrow?”. Each rewrite shifts attention toward neglected variables, revealing levers your initial phrasing hid. Keep the playful spirit; seriousness narrows vision.
List the three rules everyone follows without debate. Now flip each into a temporary requirement for the reverse behavior and prototype the smallest experiment living under that inversion. Most flips will fail usefully by surfacing blind spots; one may produce a delightfully awkward breakthrough.
Open a book, playlist, or image gallery at random and force a connection between the first item you see and your pressing problem. Describe five ways they could intersect. The absurd bridge interrupts fixation, letting a fresh interpretation of resources and obstacles appear.
List the assumptions holding your plan together, then delete one at a time by asking, “What if not?”. Without that assumption, sketch a version that still works. This thought experiment often uncovers cheaper pathways, skipped steps, and alternative partners eager to collaborate.
All Rights Reserved.